Small Study Finds Milk OIT Allergic Reactions Common, Calls for Vigilance

1252
By:
in Food Allergy, News
Published: February 22, 2019
Photo: Getty

A study of children undergoing milk allergy oral immunotherapy at a Montreal Hospital finds allergic reaction side effects are common, with 16 percent of the reactions classified as anaphylactic.

The AllerGen Network researchers say that, despite the level of reactions, cow’s milk OIT is effective in a majority of milk-allergic children. However, lead researcher Dr. Moshe Ben-Shoshan stresses the need for vigilant monitoring of such patients, “particularly during the escalation phase of OIT treatment.”

Read more about the study’s findings in the AllerGen press release below:

MONTREAL, QC (February 21, 2019) – The study, which followed 41 children undergoing milk OIT at the Montreal Children’s Hospital, found that the mean number of anaphylactic allergic reactions (AARs) per patient was 6.0 and roughly one-quarter of children withdrew from treatment due to either recurrent AARs or persistent gastrointestinal symptoms.

“The risk of AARs is one of the main limitations for the routine use of OIT,” says AllerGen researcher Dr. Moshe Ben-Shoshan, a pediatric allergist and immunologist at the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (RI-MUHC) and Montreal Children’s Hospital, and assistant professor of Pediatrics at McGill University.

“Based on our results, we recommend vigilant monitoring of all patients for both non-AARs and AARs, particularly during the escalation phase of OIT treatment.”

Dr. Moshe Ben-Shoshan

OIT is a relatively new approach to treating food allergies that exposes allergic patients to minute doses of an allergenic food, such as milk or peanut, in a controlled setting. The dose is slowly and gradually increased with the goal of desensitizing patients’ immune systems so that they can safely eat the food without experiencing an allergic reaction.

In the study, researchers used a consistent definition to classify food-induced allergic reactions into either anaphylaxis or non-anaphylactic reactions, as well as a severity grading for each reaction, offering a more accurate picture of the side-effects of OIT in children than previous studies.

An allergic reaction (AR) was defined as allergic symptoms in one organ system; whereas an anaphylactic allergic reaction (AAR) was defined as symptoms involving at least two organ systems including the skin (hives, swelling), the gastrointestinal tract (vomiting, cramps, diarrhea), respiratory system (difficulty breathing, cough, wheezing) and cardiovascular system (drop of blood pressure).

The study also identified possible factors associated with a higher risk of AARs. “We found that children with well-controlled eczema were less likely to develop AARs during OIT. Children who had an allergy specific to the milk proteins casein or alpha-lactalbumin seemed to be at higher risk for AARs during their OIT therapy,” noted the paper’s first author Dr. Sarah De Schryver, an AllerGen Highly Qualified Personnel and allergist who completed her fellowship at the Montreal Children’s Hospital.

“For patients at higher risk of AARs, we recommend individualized OIT schedules with a slower and adapted build-up protocol if needed,” said Dr. Ben-Shoshan. “Alternatively, to reduce the risk of AARs, premedication with antihistamines, Omalizumab or other new biologics could be considered, however further research is needed.”