Twinject Peek Inside

Talking Allergies

* FAQ    * Search
* Login   * Register
It is currently Thu Sep 09, 2010 3:14 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: AU- Army Sued Over Teen Death/Court Calls For Rule Change
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:24 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 10:17 pm
Posts: 4383
Location: Ottawa
Quote:
Nathan Francis was 13 when he died from anaphylactic shock after eating one mouthful of food containing peanuts at an army cadet camp.

He had been given beef satay, despite his mother's telling the camp's organisers he was allergic .

Now a court has ordered the Australian Defence Force to pay the Commonwealth $210,000 for failing to protect Nathan Francis under the Occupation Health and Safety Act.

But the judge has questioned the deterrent value of a Commonwealth agency paying a fine to the Commonwealth and has called for laws to be changed.

http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/conten ... 612447.htm

_________________
Moderator
Daughter: asthma, allergies to egg, milk, peanuts, tree nuts, all legumes except soy and penicillin
Husband: no allergies
Me: allergies to some tree that flowers in May


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:17 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 5:39 pm
Posts: 2129
Location: Toronto
So tragic.

And fortunate there weren't more deaths, considering:
Quote:
At the same camp two other boys with peanut allergies were also given meals containing peanuts, and in a separate incident six boys were lost in the bush for 18 hours.

_________________
Allergic to soy, peanut, shellfish, penicillin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:13 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 10:17 pm
Posts: 4383
Location: Ottawa
More articles are coming out:

Quote:
The school had told parents not to provide food as they were using ADF meals, but asked to be alerted to any food allergies. Nathan's mother, Jessica Francis, wrote that her son had a severe allergy, stating: "PEANUTS -- but all nuts must be avoided."

However, a list of students with food allergies did not reach the staff member who issued the meals and Nathan was given beef satay. After a mouthful, the boy was helped by a fellow student to the camp's headquarters and he died on the way to hospital.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st ... 89,00.html

and

Quote:
THE role of a Melbourne private school in the death of a teenage boy who had a fatal allergic reaction to peanuts while on an army cadet camp should be investigated by the Victorian Coroner, a judge said as he fined the army more than $200,000 for negligence...
Comcare, the federal work safety body, mounted a civil case against the Commonwealth for breaches of the Occupational Health and Safety Act over Nathan's death and the six lost boys.

The camp was run by Scotch College but the Chief of Army was responsible for safety, because army cadets are legally Commonwealth employees.

The army, which apologised to the Francis family, admitted Nathan's death was preventable and "exposed systemic faults".

Nathan's parents told the court they felt betrayed by the school, which had no peanut allergy policy and seemed "utterly ignorant".

The Scotch College principal, I. Tom Batty, said the school, which would continue to fully co-operate with the coroner, now had peanut allergy guidelines.

http://www.smh.com.au/national/teenager ... -d3t8.html

and

Quote:
"Food allergies are something which are easily managed and avoidable and in these circumstances we would ask the Victorian Coroner to also consider the involvements of Scotch College," Mr Francis said.

"While the army has been fined, they're paying the fine from one part of the government to another part of the government, which in itself has given us no satisfaction."

Justice North was also unhappy with the outcome under the Act, which essentially means one federal government agency, the ADF, pays another, Comcare.

Comcare, the Commonwealth occupational health and safety authority, launched action in the Federal Court against the ADF last June.

Justice North recommended consideration be given to changing the law, which did not serve the purpose of deterring the wrongdoer in this case because the penalty was essentially paid to the perpetrator.

http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news ... -d346.html

_________________
Moderator
Daughter: asthma, allergies to egg, milk, peanuts, tree nuts, all legumes except soy and penicillin
Husband: no allergies
Me: allergies to some tree that flowers in May


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Twinject Peek Inside
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group